CAPTCHA, ergo sum

I guess robots don’t know about Planck’s Law

The Trifid Nebula looks like a red flower with dark lines converging on its center, surrounded by pale blue gas and countless stars.

The Trifid Nebula and environs. Credit: RubinObs/NOIRLab/SLAC/NSF/DOE/AURA

May 18, 2026 Issue #1037

Mea culpa!

Oops.

Last week, in BAN #1035, I mistakenly wrote that the Psyche spacecraft was swinging past Mars to steal some of its orbital energy and speed up to meet up with its asteroid target. That’s usually why these missions get a gravity assist from planets, but not in this case! The spacecraft was using Mars to change the inclination of its orbit — the tilt it has with respect to the plane of the solar system — to match up with the asteroid Pysche’s* inclination of about 3°. Changing the tilt of a spacecraft’s orbit is very energy intensive and takes a lot of fuel… unless, that is, you steal that energy from a planet that will never miss it. Anyway, sorry for any confusion.

* Yes, the mission has the same name as its target. Yes, it really bugs me.

I might be a robot

Another reason to hate those CAPTCHA thingies

If you’ve spent any time on the internet, then you’ve run across those “Prove you’re not a robot” popups. They’re called CAPTCHAs, and they ask you to click all the images in a grid that belong to some category. They’re all irritating, though the ones that constantly refresh as you click the pictures are the worst. Is that a tiny corner of the crosswalk in that frame? Does that photo of a city intersection have a fire hydrant two pixels high in it? Arg. 

The idea behind them is that the ‘net is infested with bots, automated software that goes through pages and harvests info about them. The bots do this to aggregate stories, or steal them for plagiaristic purposes, or whatever. They’re a curse on the web, and I understand the desire for some sites to try to curtail them.

But I came across one recently that was more confounding than usual, all because I understand science. 

It was one of those “Pick everything in this category” ones, and it really did throw me:

A CAPTCHA grid with objects like a chair, ice skates, a mountain, and a steak. The question is, “pick everything that produces heat”.

I’d rather walk the planck. Credit: A random damnable web page somewhere.

I’ll admit I was initially baffled by this one, and it got worse the more I looked at it. “Pick everything that produces heat”. OK, well the sun does, obviously. But the steaks don’t; they are hot but don’t produce heat. And if you count the steaks, then you have to include the chair, the ice skates, and the mountain, too!

They’re not “hot” by colloquial standards, but they do emit heat in a scientific sense. I wrote about how this works in BAN Issue 859 in 2025. Basically, a fundamental principle in physics is that anything above a temperature of absolute zero (-273°C or -460°F) emits light. That light has a spread of wavelengths (think of them as colors if you like) that we call a blackbody curve, shaped something like a bell curve with a steep dropoff at shorter wavelengths and a long, declining tail at longer ones. This is also called Planck’s law, if you want to be more mathy about it.

The peak is at a certain wavelength (sometimes called the Wien wavelength) that depends on the temperature of the object. The lower the temperature, the longer the wavelength of that peak. The sun is quite hot at roughly 5,500°C, and emits its peak light in the visible wavelengths. But you emit light too! You have a temperature of about 37°C, more or less, and emit light in the thermal infrared, peaking at a wavelength of about 9 microns. You can’t see that light because it’s outside the wavelength range our eyes are sensitive to, but it’s still light. You’ve probably seen thermal infrared photos or video of people (sometimes called “heat vision”); that works because you emit light at that wavelength.

Even objects we think of as cold do this. Dry ice — frozen carbon dioxide, used to keep frozen products cool for transport — is at a temperature of about -80° C and peaks around 15 microns. Some astronomical objects are so cold they emit very long radio waves! You get the picture.

But CAPTCHA literally doesn’t. That chair, the skates, the mountain, the meat — they all emit light, which in a sense means they all emit heat. 

OK, fine, I may be being a little pedantic here, but I can at least claim I do it because I love to point out fun science coolness (so to speak). But in real life nothing there but the sun actually generates heat; they just are all at some temperature and passively emit energy because of it. And for the record, the “correct” answer for that CAPTCHA included the steak but not the other objects, so it was wrong either way.

In case you still think I’m being pedantic, I recently got this CAPTCHA that is truly a paragon of wrongness:

Another CAPTCHA with the question, “Tap objects that can reflect light” and shows a stream, a bed, a sock, and a pair of underwear.

SERIOUSLY? I MEAN SERIOUSLY, SERIOUSLY? Credit: A website that is openly defying science. 

ARRRRRRRRGGGGGG! “Tap objects that can reflect light”. It took me a sec to realize they meant the water in the creek, but then HOW DO THEY THINK WE CAN SEE THE BED, THE UNDERWEAR, AND THE SOCK? HUH? HUH?

All those objects reflect light. If they didn’t they’d be utterly black. That’s how we see things. Some objects, like the sun and light bulbs, emit visible light (and, as I pointed out above, they all emit light, just at wavelengths we cannot see), and others reflect light. Even the sun can reflect light. It’s not a great reflector, for sure; it tends to absorb most light that hits it, and it emits a whole lot more, plus there aren’t any sources of light bright enough for us to detect a reflection anyway.

So this particular CAPTCHA made me bang my head on my desk. Pedant or not, that one is just plain wrong.

…unless I am, in fact a robot. I can neither prove nor disprove this, but I do know that I know some science. So I will shine a light on it whenever I can, and I leave it to you to reflect on it.

Et alia

You can email me at [email protected] (though replies can take a while), and all my social media outlets are gathered together at about.me. Also, if you don’t already, please subscribe to this newsletter! And feel free to tell a friend or nine, too. Thanks!

Reply

or to participate.