Puffy exoplanets are cool, and that’s a problem

Two extra-inflated gas giants are defying explanation. Plus my book in Chinese, and why are supermassive black holes so big so early?

The Trifid Nebula looks like a red flower with dark lines converging on its center, surrounded by pale blue gas and countless stars.

The Trifid Nebula and environs. Credit: RubinObs/NOIRLab/SLAC/NSF/DOE/AURA

August 12, 2025 Issue #917

Under Alien Skies in Chinese!

Another translation of my book

I just received another copy of my book Under Alien Skies translated into a foreign language: Chinese!

Me holding a copy of the book with Chinese writing on it and a drawing of a grayscale star field

I assume this says something about the title and has some blurbs. Credit: Phil Plait 

Yay! 1.4 billion potential new readers!

This makes 4 foreign editions for the book: Italian, French, Estonian, and Chinese. I’m really thrilled it’s making its way across this planet. Maybe eventually other ones, too.

A pair of puffy planets defy expectations

The two gas giants are not hot enough to explain why they’re inflated

We’ve discovered all manners of weird planets orbiting other stars, which I suppose can be expected when there are nearly 6,000 to choose from. Some would look right in place in our own solar system, and others are truly bizarre. 

One weird flavor of planet are the puffy Jupiters, also called puffballs, or even cotton candy planets.

These are planets that are similar in mass to Jupiter, but far larger in size — this in turn means they are very low density. Another way to think of them is being inflated; something is causing these planets to puff up.

A big hint comes from their temperature: these planets tend to orbit very close to their stars. Planets this size have very deep atmospheres, and if they’re close to their host stars the incoming heat makes the gas expand, just like in a hot air balloon. The planet puffs up.

A plot of planet sizes versus the amount of heat they receive from their stars. Hotter planets are bigger.

This plot shows the size of a planet on the y-axis versus how much light it gets from its star (think of it as how much the star is heating the planet). Along the bottom the amount of light goes from 10,000 times what Earth gets from the Sun on the left to just 1% on the right. Clearly hotter planets are bigger, as you’d expect (well, until they don’t get enough heat from their star to puff them up; that’s where the points flatten out near the middle). The two planets under discussion here stand way out from the pack because they’re big without, presumably, being heated. Credit: Zhang, 2025

Elina Zhang, an astronomer at the Institute for Astronomy, found a couple of exceptions to this rule, though. Going through the data from TESS, the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite, Zhang discovered two planets that are puffy, but, crucially, they’re not hot!

The planets are called TOI-7018.01 and TOI-7081.01 (TOI stands for TESS Object of Interest, for stars that have planet candidates). Both orbit stars pretty similar to the Sun, and while both also orbit their stars relatively close in (closer than Mercury is to the Sun), they’re both well below the sort of temperature you’d expect for inflation — 400 and 650°C (I’ll note these temperatures are not measured but instead inferred from their distances to their host stars).

Still, both are bigger than you’d expect, about 1.6 times the size of Jupiter. That may not sound like much, but volume goes up with the radius cubed. Both are four times the volume of Jupiter! Plus, due to weird quantum physics that happens in the cores of such planets, Jupiter is about as big a planet you can get; dump more mass into it and it would actually get smaller. So it’s really strange they’re bigger than you’d expect.

Drawing of a puffy gas giant near its host star.

Some planets are puffy, as depicted in this drawing of another exoplanet, WASP-39b. Credit: NASA, ESA, CSA, and J. Olmsted (STScI)

Zhang looked into ways this could be a mistake. TESS finds planets when their orbits are edge-on as seen from Earth; when the planet passes in front of the star we get a mini-eclipse, and the amount of light we see from the star drops. If we know the size of the star then the amount of the dip tells us the size of the planet. But Zhang found no unusual things going on that might throw off the calculation (like a small faint companion orbiting the star, or the star being binary). From the data, it really does look like what we have here are a pair of cold puffy Jupiters.

So what’s inflating them? That’s not clear. Planets are hot when they form, and that heat leaks out over billions of years. It’s possible the atmospheric composition or structure of these two planets has done a better job insulating their interiors, so they’re hotter than expected and therefor puffier. As I mentioned above we don’t know the actual temperatures of these planets, so maybe they’re warmer than what you’d think given how close they are to the stars. 

So here we are, with nearly 6,000 planets under our belts, but we’re still finding ones that defy expectation or (at least for now) explanation. On the other hand that’s 6,000 out of hundreds of billions in our galaxy, so maybe we should expect to be surprised for a long, long time. There is still a lot of weird out there to find.

Subscribe to Premium to read the rest.

Become a paying subscriber of Premium to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content.

Already a paying subscriber? Sign In.

A subscription gets you:

  • • Three (3!) issues per week, not just one
  • • Full access to the BAN archives
  • • Leave comment on articles (ask questions, talk to other subscribers, etc.)

Reply

or to participate.